Karthik Suroju
April 25, 2017
2 min read
Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both
Here’s a situation: You’ve decided to fire an employee. Now you’ve two choices -
What will you choose?
It’s tricky. I asked my counterparts who are leading a team (in my organization and outside) on how they’d react to this situation. To my surprise, most of them said they’d try to find a replacement before firing. They said it’s ‘safe.’ Two main reasons why they don’t want to go with option-1:
On the surface, it does sound reasonable to many. But, I feel it’s more ‘defensive’ than ‘safe.’ Let me explain.
No good organization ever said that they hire average people. From an early stage startup to the biggest players in the industry, everyone hires the bright and brilliant.
Not every hire will go on to become a great employee.
If you were ever involved in the hiring process, you’d know how difficult is it to find the right candidate. Hiring is tough. You probably pat yourself on the back after finding the ideal candidate. Imagine, from this to having to decide on firing the same person. See, firing is tougher.
Not every hire will go on to become a great employee. It might be a cultural mismatch, or the employee’s inability to perform well despite several opportunities. You have your reasons.
After what is seemingly a tough decision, comes the tricky part — whether to fire immediately or wait till you find a replacement.
I’d always, always go with option-1: fire immediately and then hire a replacement. There’s a flaw with the ‘safe’ approach:
Trying to hire a replacement before firing has its disadvantages too.
Your team members will not get it right away. They might complain about the ‘one less resource.’ That’s fine. You’ll learn to deal with it. Just believe in your decision, there is no point in delaying the inevitable.
Yes, it won’t be a popular choice. But, it’s the right one.
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I —
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.